Blog durchsuchen
Profil
Ali Arbia hat in Internationalen Beziehungen am Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies in Genf promoviert. Er ist überzeugter Europäer, ein echtes Zoon Politikon und interessiert sich für fast alles ausser Sport (und selbst das manchmal).
Letzte Einträge
- Was Islamkritik von Islamophobie unterscheidet16 Kommentare· 17.02.12
- Zwei Texte zu Syrien: Wie weiter?7 Kommentare· 15.02.12
- Bürgermonolog? Eine offene Diskussion zum Islam (unter falschen Prämissen)27 Kommentare· 10.02.12
- Milgrams missverstandenes Experiment20 Kommentare· 08.02.12
- Terroristen als Verschwörungstheoretiker11 Kommentare· 03.02.12
Kommentare
- sylar · 20.02.12 · 09:18 Uhr Was Islamkritik von Islamophobie unterscheidet
- ... · 20.02.12 · 00:07 Uhr Zwei Texte zu Syrien: Wie weiter?
- Stefan W. · 17.02.12 · 06:02 Uhr Bürgermonolog? Eine offene Diskussion zum Islam (unter falschen Prämissen)
- ali · 15.02.12 · 14:00 Uhr Foreign Affairs: Kreativer Umgang mit Abschreckungstheorie zur Kriegsrechtfertigung
- ... · 12.02.12 · 03:41 Uhr Eine interne Umfrage: Internationale Beziehungen und seine Schubladen
Blogroll
english science english IR/PoliSci- The Monkey Cage
- Crooked Timber
- PolySigh
- Foreign Policy Passport
- Stephen M. Walt
- Daniel W. Drezner
- Marc Lynch
- The Cable
- The Multilateralist
- The Duck of Minerva
- IPE at the University of North Carolina
- The Quantitative Peace
- Informed Comment
- International Economic Law and Policy Blog
- ISN Blog
- Overcoming Bias
- PoliSciZurich
- Democracy in America
- Certain Ideas of Europe
- Glenn Greenwald
- A fistful of Euros
- The Conscience of a Liberal (Paul Krugman)
- Dispatches from the Culture Wars
- Matthew Yglesias
- Science-Based Running
- Rationally Speaking
- Daily Coyote
- zooborns
- Boing Boing
- Stefan Niggemeier
- Law Blog
Kategorien
Archiv
- Februar 2012
- Januar 2012
- Dezember 2011
- November 2011
- Oktober 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- Juli 2011
- Juni 2011
- Mai 2011
- April 2011
- März 2011
- Februar 2011
- Januar 2011
- Dezember 2010
- November 2010
- Oktober 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- Juli 2010
- Juni 2010
- Mai 2010
- April 2010
- März 2010
- Februar 2010
- Januar 2010
- Dezember 2009
- November 2009
- Oktober 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- Juli 2009
- Juni 2009
- Mai 2009
- April 2009
- März 2009
- Februar 2009
- Januar 2009
- Dezember 2008
- November 2008
- Oktober 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- Juli 2008
- Juni 2008
- Mai 2008
- April 2008
- März 2008
- Februar 2008
« vorheriger Beitrag · nächster Beitrag »
29.11.09 · 16:14 Uhr
A majority of Swiss voters are bigots
Kategorie: Politik·Religion · Kommentare: 4
Without doubt today the image of Swiss democracy abroad has suffered. By a clear majority the Swiss have voted to put into the constitution a ban on building minarets and minarets only. This fact and the wish to make a statement of protests are the reasons why I write for once in English.
The image a majority of Swiss voters have projected for everyone to see, is one of a democracy that indulges in the tyranny of the majority. The image of a democracy where voters are not mature enough to look beyond their own narrow world of interests and where the citizens seem not to be able to take a step back from their dear clichés. Most importantly, today the Swiss voters have shown that they have no respect for their own constitution nor for the rule of law.
I have certainly no sympathies for Islam nor do I for any other religion. But this vote was not about Islam or religious buildings in the first place. It was about an amendment to the constitution that explicitly discriminates a specific religious minority. But a state cannot discriminate between beliefs because they are what they are: A matter of belief, not fact. There lies an important part of the problem. Because you have to believe the truth and you cannot establish it by proof you are likely to be in your own religion's bubble. What will look like discrimination to an outside observer will seem perfectly fair to you. A majority of Swiss voters was thinking with their guts.1 This is the country which discriminated in its constitution against Jews until 1874 and against Jesuits until 1973 after all.
What happens next? The implementing legislation will lead to further discussions. Perhaps they will find a workaround but I really don't see how except for a non-implementation. Sooner or later the ban will be challenged by courts probably ultimately by the Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg. Then the right will cry foul. They will launch into their spiel about 'foreign judges' and 'meddling in internal affairs' which of course never prevented them condescendingly teaching everyone how great the Swiss political system is, that it is the only example to follow and worth imitating.
The next time a Swiss lectures you about our democracy and federalism, do me the favour and just mention the minaret ban. I for my part, I am ashamed of the vote today. Please take note and consider this as a part of Switzerland too. As a Swiss citizen you learn to accept the will of the majority. To a certain extend the system is based on exactly that trust.
It is sad, but today it is one of the few times I have to state: I am not a Swiss democrat.
Or to say it a little bit less prosaically with the words of the German impressionist painter Max Liebermann commenting on the Nazi victory marches: I could not eat as much as I would like to vomit.
1To be fair, it has to be mentioned that the leadership of most churches in Switzerland have opposed the ban and campaigned against it.
Autor: ali· 4 Kommentare· Permalink· Trackback-URL
Kommentar schreiben
Top5
- Vahrenholts kalte Sonne, Svensmarks kosmische Strahlen und der KlimawandelAstrodicticum Simplex· 10.02.2012
- Die Praxis der "Alternativmedizin": Ein Insider berichtetKritisch gedacht· 08.02.2012
- Die dunkle Materie ist keine ErfindungAstrodicticum Simplex· 07.02.2012
- Wer beherrscht die Welt wirklich?Astrodicticum Simplex· 15.02.2012
- Die Kältewelle in Europa, vom All aus gesehenAstrodicticum Simplex· 11.02.2012
Top5
- Vahrenholts kalte Sonne, Svensmarks kosmische Strahlen und der KlimawandelAstrodicticum Simplex· 10.02.2012
- Der Atheismus als eine Religion unter vielen?Frischer Wind· 14.02.2012
- Die Praxis der "Alternativmedizin": Ein Insider berichtetKritisch gedacht· 08.02.2012
- World Skeptics Congress 2012 in BerlinKritisch gedacht· 06.02.2012
- Die dunkle Materie ist keine ErfindungAstrodicticum Simplex· 07.02.2012
ScienceBlogs.com
- Patient satisfaction versus quality of careIf there's one thing that purveyors of complementary and alternative ...Respectful Insolence· 20.02.2012 · 03:19 Uhr
- Forcing Doctors to Perform Unnecessary Medical Procedures is Unethical and UnlawfulMany bloggers and commentators have expressed outrage over the decision ...denialism blog· 19.02.2012 · 12:39 Uhr
- Keep the Creation Museum off the Kiddie ListKentucky's Creation Museum is in contention for listing as one ...Greg Laden's Blog· 19.02.2012 · 10:33 Uhr
- Eta Carinae's 21-Year Outburst: A Cosmic Instant Replay!Not explaining science seems to me perverse When you're in ...Starts With A Bang· 17.02.2012 · 22:32 Uhr
- Genetics Guard Against Alcohol-Induced Brain DamageThis post was written by Brookhaven Lab science writer Justin ...Brookhaven Bits & Bytes· 17.02.2012 · 10:54 Uhr







Kommentare (4)
Although I am watching the expansion of fundamentalist Islam in many European countries and the attempts of fundamentalists to radicalise moderate Muslims with growing concern, I cannot help but agree with this article. Religious discrimination, any kind of discrimination by and through law and legislation is a two-edged blade, as it can readily be used against those who originally proposed it to further their personal agenda. More than that, it is inherently wrong and should not be tolerated. Equality before the law is one of the foundations of a free society.
[i]The most certain test by which we judge whether a country is really free is the amount of security enjoyed by minorities.[/i] (Lord Acton)
Wann haben wir in der Schweiz schon wieder das Frauenstimmrecht eingeführt? 1970 und in Appenzell im Jahr 1990.
Da wundere ich mich auch nicht über solche Abstimmungsresultate wie heute.
Klar ist es peinlich für die Schweiz, dass ein Grossteil der Stimmbürger/innen so kleinliche, reaktionäre Menschen sind. Aber was solls. Ich setze meine Hoffnung darin dass dieser neue Verfassungsartikel von Strassburg kassiert wird. Und wenn nicht, wird er vielleicht in 50 Jahren wieder einmal abgeschafft.
Den Glauben and den menschlichen Fortschritt habe ich noch nicht aufgegeben, auch wenn er sich hauptsächlich darin begründet, dass alte Leute irgend einmal weg sterben und junge Menschen sich tendenziell eher schon an Veränderungen gewöhnt haben. ;)
@Ali
You said :
"It is sad, but today it is one of the few times I have to state: I am not a Swiss democrat."
Are you then a terrorist ?
"Klar ist es peinlich für die Schweiz, dass ein Grossteil der Stimmbürger/innen so kleinliche, reaktionäre Menschen sind."
ja, leider :/